Allowed

Shri. Srirang Devram Gadadare and Anr. v. Dashrath Tukaram Raut and Ors.

Bombay HC23 Jan 2019WP/10749/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court allowed writ petitions challenging a land acquisition award. Relying on a prior judgment, the court quashed the award and directed respondents to determine compensation under the 2013 Act within one year.

What did the court decide?

The award was quashed. Respondents directed to determine compensation under the 2013 Act and pay within one year.

Shri. Srirang Devram Gadadare and Anr. Vs Dashrath Tukaram… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

Nalawade

¶2

26-wp-10749-17 & anr,.doc

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 10749 OF 2017

¶5

Shri. Srirang Devram Gadadare and anr.

¶6

...Petitioners

¶7

Vs.

¶8

Dashrath Tukaram Raut and ors.

¶9

...Respondents.

¶10

WITH

¶11

WRIT PETITION ST. NO. 7470 OF 2017

¶12

Sonaba Gangaram Khaladkar and ors.

¶13

...Petitioners.

¶14

Vs.

¶15

Dattu Nathu Jogade and ors.

¶16

...Respondents.

¶17

Mr. S.S.Salunkhe for the Petitioners. Mr. R.S.Pawar, AGP. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 6.

¶18

Mr.Akshay Patil i/by S.K.Legal Associates for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 in W.P.St. No.7470/2017.

¶19

CORAM : R.M.BORDE AND V.L. ACHLIYA, JJ. DATE : 23^rd January, 2019

¶20

JUDGMENT : ( Per R.M. Borde,J.)

¶21

Rule,

¶22

With the consent of the parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith

Page-1/3

Nalawade

26-wp-10749-17 & anr,.doc

¶27

and petitions are taken up for final disposal at admission stage.

¶28

The issue raised in the instant petitions is no more res-integra and covered by the Judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No.10413 of 2017 decided on 8^th January, 2019.

¶29

The petitioners are land owners and their landed property is subject matter of acquisition for development of Bhama Askhed Irrigation Project. The petitioners herein are similarly situated as in the case of the petitioner in decided matter. The award determining the amount of compensation in the case of the present petitioners is also same as in the case of decided matter. Since the instant matters proceed on the basis of the same facts as in the case of Writ Petition No.10413 of 2017, the directions issued by this Court while disposing of the aforesaid matter shall have to be issued in the present petitions.

¶30

For the reasons recorded while disposing of Writ Petition No. 10413 of 2017, the instant writ petitions are allowed. The award declared by the Land Acquisition OfÏcer so far as it relates to the

¶31

¶32

Page-2/3

¶33

Nalawade 26-wp-10749-17 & anr,.doc present petitioners are concerned is quashed. Since the possession of

¶34

the property has not been taken over by the acquiring body, the amount

¶35

of compensation shall have to be determined by observing the procedure prescribed under the Act of 2013 . The respondents are directed to complete the acquisition proceedings in respect of determination of amount of compensation and declare the award and pay compensation so determined under award within one year from today.

¶36

Rule is accordingly made absolute.

¶37

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶38

(V.L. ACHLIYA, J.)

¶39

( R.M. BORDE, J.)

¶40

¶41

Page-3/3

Shri. Srirang Devram Gadadare and Anr. v. Dashrath Tukaram Raut and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Srirang Devram Gadadare and Anr. v. Dashrath Tukaram Raut and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Kalgonda Balgonda Patil Vs Shri. Ramchandra Dattu Rane and Ors.

Shri Sanjay Madhav Bhide Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dhanaji Dattu Mhaske Vs the Union of India , Ministry of Road Transport and National Highway and Ors.

Gajanan Shankar Rane through His Ca Holder Vs the State of Maharashtra through Govt. Pleader and Ors.

Gajanan Shankar Rane through His Ca Holder Vs the State of Maharashtra through Govt. Pleader and Ors.

M. Visvesvaraya Industrial Research and Development Centre (Mvirdc) and Anr. Vs Ashwini Joshi