A writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to avail the remedy available under the Securitization Act. The court permitted withdrawal to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to approach the competent Redressal Forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
918.WP.105.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
918 WRIT PETITION NO.105 OF 2019
HOTEL SHITAL THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR BHAGWAT PRALHAD GADEKAR
VERSUS
THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE JALNA AND ORS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Nanabhau R. Thorat AGP for Respondent : Mrs. R. P. Gour
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND S. M. GAVHANE, JJ.
DATE : 1st February, 2019
ORAL ORDER :
withdrawal of the petition. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner would avail the remedy available to the petitioner under the provisions of Securitization Act, namely the Debts Recovery Tribunal.
1/2
918.WP.105.19.odt
approaching the competent Redressal Forum. Petition is allowed
to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(S. M. GAVHANE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
habeeb
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hotel Shital Through Its Proprietor Bhagwat Pralhad Gadekar
The District Magistrate Jalna and Ors
Prasanna B. Varale
S. M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
