Disposed
Santosh Namdeo Mokale v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCWP/10391/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 910-WP-10391-19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.10391 OF 2019
SANTOSH NAMDEO MOKALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Sushant V. Dixit AGP for Respondent No.1 : Mrs. A. V. Gondhalekar
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ
DATED : 22nd AUGUST, 2019.
ORDER :-
Learned AGP raises a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternate remedy before the learned Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal to redress his grievance.
[ K. K. SONAWANE ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE
rrd
Santosh Namdeo Mokale
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
K. K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court