Partly allowed
J.K.Girola v. G.K.Girola
Bombay HCTS/30/1997
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In a testamentary suit regarding a will, the court dismissed a caveat as withdrawn by the defendant who did not wish to challenge the willled to grant the suit and disposed of the matter.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
3 ts 30.1997.doc
¶2
1/1
¶3
Dusane
¶4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
¶5
TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 30 OF 1997
¶6
Jagdish Kisan Girolla....Plaintiff/
Petitioner
Vs.
Shri. Gajanan Kisan Girolla....Defendant/
Caveat
¶7
Ms. Archana K. Shirsekar for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Sameer Tendulkar for Defendant.
¶8
Coram : Shri. A.K. Menon, J.
Date : 6th November 2019
¶9
P.C.:
¶10
1. Mr. Tendulkar, learned counsel on behalf of the defendant
¶11
states that he has instructions to withdraw the Caveat inasmuch as
¶12
the defendant does not wish to challenge the Will. In view thereof,
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Jagdish Kisan Girolla
- respondent
Shri. Gajanan Kisan Girolla
Coram
AI extract
A.K. Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court