On production, the High Court quashed conviction orders under S. 138 NI Act and appellate judgments pursuant to a settlement agreement and consent terms filed by the parties.
Orders dated 20th June, 2012 and 1st February, 2016 were quashed and set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
p518-revn-7-2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 7 OF 2019
Shri.Madhukar Devba Patil
...Applicant
Versus
Padmabhushan Vasantdada Patil Usatodni Vahatuk Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit & Anr.
...Respondents
Mr.Shrishail Sakhare for the Applicant. Mr.Abhijit M.Adagule for Respondent No.1. Mr. A.R.Patil, APP for Respondent No.2-State.
CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 09 APRIL 2019
P.C.:
1/2
Trupti
p518-revn-7-2019.doc
marked as Exhibit 1 . Both the parties undertake to comply with the terms and conditions mentioned in the consent terms.
(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
2/2
Trupti
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to quash the impugned orders upon settlement and consent terms filed by parties.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Shri Madhukar Devba Patil
Padmabhushan Vasantdada Patil Usatodni Vahatuk Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit
Anr
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
