Public Interest Litigation withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh PIL after incorporating pleadings; dismissed as not pressed.
liberty to file a fresh PIL after incorporating pleadings concerning violation of the Bombay Highway Act, 1955.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
4-pil-83-19.doc
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 83 OF 2019
Mr. Vijay Mahadev Mane & Anr.
.. Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. Shantanu Chandratre for Petitioners. Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for State.
CORAM: PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, CJ. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.
AUGUST 14, 2019.
P.C.
SMT. BHARATI DANGRE,J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Mr. Vijay Mahadev Mane & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
