Govind Babanrao Yewle v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCPIL/59/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petitioner contended that a Public Interest Litigation became infructuous due to subsequent events and sought its disposal. The Court recorded this submission.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
59.14PIL.odt
¶2
1
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
¶4
962 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.59 OF 2014
¶5
GOVIND BABANRAO YEWLE
VERSUS
¶6
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
¶7
...
¶8
Mr.G.R.Syed, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.S.Y.Mahajan, Addl.G.P. for the respondent-
State.
¶9
...
¶10
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE &
R.G.AVACHAT,JJ.
DATE : 25.01.2019
¶11
PER COURT:
¶12
Learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner submits that due to subsequent
events occurred after filing this Public
Interest Litigation, the PIL has rendered
infructuous. Hence, the PIL is disposed of as
infructuous.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the Public Interest Litigation rendered infructuous by subsequent events should be disposed of accordingly.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Govind Babanrao Yeule
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
AI extract
S.S.Shinde
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Jan Mukti Morcha vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Citizen Forum for Sanctity in Educational System, through Member, Mr. Sanjay Mukund Kelkar Vs Member Secretary, Aicte and Ors.
Shri. Sanjay Dnyanoba Doke Vs Jalindar Bhagwan Doke and Ors.
Ganesh Harishchandra Gole Vs State of Maharashtra through the Secretary and Ors.