Public Interest Litigation PIL No. 43 of 2019 allowed to be withdrawn on grounds that the issue is sub judice. The petition stands disposed of with liberty to approach the Court later. Pending civil applications do not survive and are disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil43.19.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 43 OF 2019
Girish Tukaram Jadhav
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr. B.S. Shinde, advocate for petitioner. Mrs. M.A. Deshpande, AGP for respondents
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND
NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ. DATE : 20th March, 2019.
P.C. :
Learned counsel for petitioner, prays for withdrawal of the Public Interest Litigation in view of the fact that the issue is already before this Court for consideration and, with liberty that as and when the occasion arises and if so advised, the petitioner be permitted to approach this Court.
Public Interest Litigation is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for and accordingly stands disposed of.
In view of disposal of Public Interest Litigation, pending civil applications, if any, do not survive and stand disposed of.
NITIN W. SAMBRE
PRASANNA B. VARALE
JUDGE
JUDGE
dyb
Girish Tukaram Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
Prasanna B. Varale
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
