The petitioner, in a PIL, sought leave to withdraw the petition arguing the concerned unit had ceased functioning. The court granted leave and dismissed the petition.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904.PIL 5.19.doc
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 5 OF 2019
Mr. Sajjad Moinuddin Sheikh … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary and Ors. ... Respondents
... Respondents
Ms. Sadhna Kumar for the Petitioner. Mr. P.P. Kakade, AGP for Respondent No.1. Ms. Jaya Bagwe for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL,C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 22 JANUARY, 2019.
P.C. :-
The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner submits that the prayers in the PIL have become infructuous as the Unit has stopped functioning. She seeks leave to withdraw the Petition.
N.M. JAMDAR, J.
CHIEF JUSTICE
Mr. Sajjad Moinuddin Sheikh
The State of Maharashtra
Naresh H. Patil
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
