Ajit Shantaram Mahadik v. Maharashtra Housing Development Authority (Mhada) and 4 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner failed to appear. Public Interest Litigation dismissed in default of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9 PIL 7 - 2019.doc
1
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 7 OF 2019
Ajit Shantaram Mahadik … Petitioner
V/s.
Maharashtra Housing Development Authority, (MHADA) and others
… Respondents.
None for the Petitioner. Mr.P.G.Lad, for Respondent No.1 – MHADA. Ms.K.H.Mastakar, for Respondent No.3 – MCGM.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG,C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 24 JUNE 2019.
P.C. :-
instant Public Interest Petition, the same is dismissed in default.
N.M. JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Ajit Shantaram Mahadik
Maharashtra Housing Development Authority
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
Pradeep Nandrajog
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court