A public interest litigation challenging grievances regarding a petitioner was disposed of. The court held that the petitioner's grievance had already been redressed at the time of hearing.
Public Interest Litigation stand disposed of with the grievance being redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil18.15
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.18 OF 2015
Hemant s/o Arunchandra Kapadia,
Age-60 years, Occu:Business,
R/o-25, Shantiniketan Colony,
Aurangabad, Dist-Aurangabad.
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
Maharashtra State Electricity
Distribution Company Ltd.,
Through: Chief Engineer (Commercial),
M.S.D.C.L., Prakashgad,
Bandra (East), Mumbai
and others.
...RESPONDENTS
...
Mr.K.C. Sant Advocate for Petitioner.
Mr.A.S. Bajaj Advocate for Resp. No.2.
Mr.Anand Kulkarni Advocate h/f. Mr. Rajendra
Deshmukh Advocate for Resp. No.3
Mr.S.B. Yawalkar A.G.P. for Resp. No.4.
...
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATE : 11TH FEBRUARY, 2019
pil18.15
2
ORDER :
1.Learned counsel appearing for the
Petitioner, on instructions, submits that
Petitioner's grievance is redressed after filing
this Public Interest Litigation.
2.In that view of the matter, this Public
Interest Litigation stands disposed of.
[R.G. AVACHAT, J.] [S.S. SHINDE, J.]
asb/FEB19
Hemant s/o Arunchandra Kapadia
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd.
S.S. SHINDE
R.G. AVACHAT
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court