Disposed
Bhausaheb Bhimrao Palve v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCPIL/18/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.18 OF 2014
Bhausaheb s/o Bhimrao Palve
... PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
... RESPONDENTS
Shri B.T. Bodkhe, Advocate holding for Shri S.S. Thombre, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.B. Yawalkar, A.G.P. for State Shri U.K. Patil, advocate for respondents No.2, 4 & 6 Shri A.S. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No.7 Shri A.O. Ostwal, advocate for Intervenor
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATED : 21st February, 2019
ORAL ORDER :
R.G. AVACHAT S.S. SHINDE JUDGE JUDGE
fmp/
Bhausaheb s/o Bhimrao Palve
The State of Maharashtra
S.S. Shinde
R.G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court