PIL listed for directions sought action against unauthorized land development. Court found precautionary measures taken per affidavit; disposed of petition ensuring development conforms to law.
Appeal disposed of as no further action needed to ensure development conforms to law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903-PIL-100-2010.DOC
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.100 OF 2010
Shri Prabhakar Vasudev Chudhary & Anr. … Petitioners Versus Thane Municipal Corporation & Ors. …Respondents
Mr. Sagar Joshi, for the Petitioners.
Mr. Ram Apte, Senior Counsel with Mr. N.R. Bubna for Respondent No.1.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R. I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATED: 5TH NOVEMBER 2019
PC:-
take appropriate action against development on a plot of land more particularly described in the prayer clause so that the development of the property is in accordance with law.
1/2
903-PIL-100-2010.DOC
Public Interest Litigation will not be kept pending. It is disposed of.
( R. I. CHAGLA, J. )
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
2/2
Shri Prabhakar Vasudev Chudhary & Anr.
Thane Municipal Corporation & Ors.
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
R. I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
