The court accepted an application to withdraw the notice of motion as infructuous due to the defendant transmitting the amounts. The notice of motion was dismissed.
Notice of motion dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
kvm
1/1
3-NMTL317.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 317 OF 2018 IN
PETITION NO. 291 OF 2010
Harish Sadanand Jawale ..... Deceased Hema Sadanand Jawale ….. Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEE Hema Sadanand Jawale ….. Petitioner VERSUS Rajesh N. Nawale, Allahabad Bank, Branch Manager ….. Proposed Respondent
Mr.D.V.Deokar for the Plaintiff/Applicant.
Mr.Navid Menon for the Respondent.
CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J. DATE : 16th JANUARY, 2019
P.C .
Mr.Deokar, learned consel for the plaintiff seeks liberty to withdraw this notice of motion on the ground that the notice of motion has become infructuous in view of the defendant transmitting the amounts in the account of the plaintiff. Statement is accepted.
[R.D. DHANUKA, J.]
Harish Sadanand Jawale (Deceased Hema Sadanand Jawale)
Rajesh N. Nawale (Allahabad Bank, Branch Manager)
R.D. DHANUKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
