This notice of motion was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the applicant-plaintiff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-NMS-1987 & 2000-of-2011-&-1280-of-2012.doc
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1987 OF 2011
ALONG WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2000 OF 2011
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1280 OF 2012
IN
SUIT NO.1269 OF 2011
Gulabbai Sitaram Bairagi ….Applicant In the matter between Gulabbai Sitaram Bairagi ….Plaintiff V/s. Durgadevi Ramkrishna Vaishnav and Ors. ….Defendants And R.H. Sulaney and Ors. ….Respondents
None present.
CORAM : A.K. MENON, J. DATED : 11TH SEPTEMBER, 2019.
P.C. :
None present for the applicant-plaintiff. It appears that the applicantplaintiff is not interested in prosecuting these notices of motion. Accordingly, all these notices of motion are dismissed for want of prosecution.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
1/1
Gulabbai Sitaram Bairagi
Durgadevi Ramkrishna Vaishnav and Ors.
A.K. Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
