The court found the Notice of Motion for expedited hearing infructuous due to the plaintiff's death. The application was disposed of without a separate order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16-NMS160-16.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 160 OF 2016 IN
SUIT NO. 1479 OF 2007
Suresh Mohanlal Goradia ...Applicant In the matter between Suresh Mohanlal Goradia ...Plaintiff
Versus
M/s. Shah Construction Company & anr. …Defendants
Ms. Pinky Sharma, i/b V & M Legal, for Defendant no.1. Ms. Urvi Shah, i/b I. R. Joshi & Co., for Defendant no.2.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 4th NOVEMBER, 2019
PC:-
1/2
16-NMS160-16.DOC
ground of advanced age of the plaintiff. Hence, the notice of motion stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
2/2
Suresh Mohanlal Boradia (deceased)
M/s. Shah Construction Company
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
