Disposed
Magna Developers v. Alf Developers and Ors.
Bombay HCNMCD/1603/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
precipe.doc IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
COMNM1588.19-
¶2
1/4
¶3
precipe.doc
¶4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
¶5
COMMERCIAL NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1588 OF 2019 COMMERCIAL NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1589 OF 2019 COMMERCIAL NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1590 OF 2019 COMMERCIAL NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1594 OF 2019 COMMERCIAL NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1603 OF 2019 IN
¶6
COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.336 OF 2019
¶7
Magna Developers )....Plaintiffs V/s. Alf Developers & Anr. )....Defendants
¶8
Mr.Rahul P.Jain for defendant nos.3 to 7.
¶9
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM,J DATE : 10.7.2019
¶10
P.C.:-
¶11
- Mentioned. Not on board.
¶12
- Mr.Jain for defendant nos.3 to 7 states plaintiffs have endorsed their No objection to condoning the delay of 19/20 days beyond the 30 days period. A copy of the praecipe with the endorsement is scanned and reproduced below :-
Coram
AI extract
K.R.SHRIRAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court