The Bombay High Court, through two judges, granted leave to the appellants to withdraw Commercial Appeal No. 52 of 2017 and Notice of Motion No. 10 of 2017 pending before it. Consequently, both proceedings stood disposed of as withdrawn.
Leave granted to withdraw the appeal and notice of motion; proceedings disposed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
jdk 1 of 2 1.comap.52.1_nmca.10.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 52 OF 2017 IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 838 OF 2016
Bharat Kapoor and Ors.
.. Appellants /
Ori. Petitioners
Vs.
Kaizen Domestic Scheme Mumbai and Anr.
.. Respondents / Ori. Respondents
WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 10 OF 2017 IN COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 52 OF 2017 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 838 OF 2016
Mrs. Suman Kapoor .. Applicant / Appellant No.2
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN :
Bharat Kapoor and Ors.
.. Appellants / Ori. Petitioners
Vs.
Kaizeen Domestic Scheme and Anr.
.. Respondents / Ori. Respondents
jdk 2 of 2 1.comap.52.1_nmca.10.17.doc
Mr. Anil D'Souza Advocate for Appellants
Mr. Samir Pandit along with Ms. Sarrah Khambati i/b Wadia Ghandy and Co. for Respondents
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J. DATED : MARCH 13, 2019
P.C.:
N.M.JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
kandarkar
Bharat Kapoor and Ors.
Mrs. Suman Kapoor
Kaizen Domestic Scheme Mumbai and Anr.
NARESH H. PATIL
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
