This short order condoned a 61-day delay in preferring an appeal and allowed the Notice of Motion. The bench comprised Chief Justice P. C. Nandrajog and Justice Bharati Dangre.
Delay of 61 days condoned; Notice of Motion allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(16) NMA 738-19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Amk
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 738 OF 2019
IN
APPEAL (L) NO. 338 OF 2019 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 980 OF 2019 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 38 OF 2017 IN NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 553 OF 2015 IN SUIT NO. 2160 OF 2009
Prasad J. Satam .. Applicant
In the matter between
Prasad J. Satam .. Appellant Vs. Vijay A. Gosrani & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Vishal Kanade i/b Mr. Jignesh Shah for the Applicant. Mr. Chirag Balsara a/w. Mr. Ashish Sharma i/b ALJ & Partners for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. DATE : 1 st OCTOBER, 2019.
P. C. :
[SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in preferring the Appeal is condonable.
Prasad J. Satam
Vijay A. Gosrani
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
