The High Court at Bombay dismissed a notice of motion due to the non-appearance of both parties. The matter was declared to be disposed of for non-prosecution without any further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 688 OF 2011
in
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1889 OF 2007
in APPEAL NO. 679 OF 2007
in
PETITION NO. 272 OF 2004
Samith B. Kamble … Applicant/Appellant V/s. Mahesh M. Gaikwad ... Respondent.
None for the Applicant/Appellant. None for the Respondent.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL,C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 4 JANUARY, 2019.
P.C. :-
Perused the orders passed earlier. By order dated 17 December 2018, the matter was placed today for dismissal as none had appeared. Even today none appears.
N.M. JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Samith B. Kamble
Mahesh M. Gaikwad
NARESH H. PATIL
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
