Disposed
The Commissioner O Cgst and Central Excise, Mumbai(West) v. Sasan Power Limited.
Bombay HCNMA/179/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
179-19.doc IN THE HIGH COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
mdp
1/1 nm 179-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.179 OF 2019 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L.)NO. 248 OF 2019
The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai (West),
…Appellant
Versus
M/s. Sasan Power Limited ...Respondent
Mr. Sham Walve and Mr. Ram Ochani for appellant Mr. Prabhakar K. Shetty for respondent.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 12th April 2019
P.C.:
Heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. Sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay of four days. Accordingly, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
The Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai (West)
M/s. Sasan Power Limited
A.S.Oka
M.S.Sanklecha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court