The court dismissed a review application rejecting the applicant's attempt to compare OBCs with SC/ST for NCT result concessions, finding no grounds to review the prior decision.
Review application dismissed. No re-examination of prior decision ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY: NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Misc. Civil Application [Review] No. 112 of 2019 IN Writ Petition No. 8176 of 2018 [decided] [Shashikant Vitthalrao Kadu Vs. University Grants Commission & others]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Mr. S. D. Chande, Adv., for the applicant.
CORAM : R. K. DESHPANDE AND VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 15th March, 2019
Heard the learned counsel for the Applicantpetitioner.
The Applicant-petitioner is trying to compare the Other Backward Classes category with Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes for the purposes of concession in the results of National Eligibility Test. This aspect of alleged
2
discrimination has already been dealt with in our decision rendered on 3rd December, 2018 in Writ Petition No. 8176 of 2018. We, therefore, do not find any reason to review the said decision.
Application is dismissed.
Judge Judge
|hedau|
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to review the earlier decision regarding OBC comparison with SC/ST for NCT result concessions.
Shashikant Vitthalrao Kadu
University Grants Commission
R. K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
