Sandeepkumar Vinod Saraf v. Jagdish Bhagwandas Ahuja and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
45 OF
What did the court decide?
Notice No.45 of 2019 allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file and serve a fresh notice if so advised.
45 OF
Notice No.45 of 2019 allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file and serve a fresh notice if so advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904 INOT 45 OF 2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN INSOLVENCY NOTICE NO.45 OF 2019
Re :
…
Jagdish Bhagwandas Ahuja and Ors. Judgment Debtors
versus
…
Sandeepkumar Vinod Saraf Judgment Creditor
…
Judgment Creditor
Ms. Disha Vardhan i/by Sudhir Shah and Associates, for Judgment Creditor.
CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.
DATE: 6th NOVEMBER, 2019
P.C.:
1. The learned Advocate appearing for the Judgment Creditor seeks to
withdraw the above Notice No.45 of 2019 with liberty to file and serve a fresh notice ifso advised. In view thereof, Notice No.45 of 2019 is allowed to be withdrawn with
liberty as sought.
( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. )
1/1
ssp
Jagdish Bhagwandas Ahuja and Ors.
Sandeepkumar Vinod Saraf
S.J. KATHAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court