not even made any inquiry nor made any complaint with her parents about the alleged girlfriend, then it will have to be held that, those allegations were wild and baseless. The ratio laid down in Dr. N. G. Dastane V. Mrs. S. Dastane, reported in A.I.R. 1975 S.C. 1534, were applicable in this case. In fact, the list of allegations made by the husband from “A” to “N” given by the learned Judge of the Family Court in his judgment, which were the grounds on which the husband was seeking divorce, have been brushed aside by saying that, those allegations are vague and general. But then when it came to specific allegation about having a girlfriend, and for her, the husband wanted divorce from the wife, were found by the learned Judge of the Family Court as not wild and baseless. This is the perversity in the Judgment. When the wife left the home on 11-042012 admittedly, leaving the small child of two years, and is not assigning any reason, then definitely such act on the part of the wife amounted to cruelty for the husband, so also the other acts referred above amounted to cruelty. Even if for the sake of arguments it is accepted that, some of the grounds from “A” to “N” might not have been strictly proved by the husband yet the aforesaid circumstances amounting to cruelty have been proved by the husband entitling him to get a decree of divorce. The learned Judge of the Family Court
