Dismissed
Smt. Vimaladevi Rajaram and Ors. v. Union of India through the General Manager
Bombay HCFA/431/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
944-19=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30 fast 944-19=.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 944 OF 2019
Office Notes, Court's or Judge's orders. Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. Mohan Rao for the Appellant. Mr. N.D. Sharma for Respondent.
CORAM: K.K.TATED, J. DATED : 03/09/2019
P.C.
2 By this First Appeal, the Appellant original Claimant is challenging the judgment and award dated 22.12.2017 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, Mumbai in Application No. 511 of 2012 rejecting Applicant's claim application.
3 Considering the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the Appellant and the Judgment and Award, I am satisfied that Appellant has made out a case for following order:
Sneha Chavan
1/2
30 fast 944-19=.doc
b) Printing is dispensed with. c) Appellant to file private paper book within one year from today, failing which First Appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Court.
d) Registry is directed to call R & P immediately.
(K.K.TATED, J.)
Sneha Chavan
2/2
Appellant
Respondent
K.K. Tated
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court