The Bombay High Court, Coram R.I. Chagla, J., dismissed multiple execution applications under Original Side Rules Rule 329 for want of prosecution due to inactivity exceeding 12 months, as no applicant appeared.
All execution applications were dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-63.EXA.687.12.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 687 OF 2012
| Abhyudaya Co-Op. Bank Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Naresh Kanyalal Rajwani | ||
| Prop. of M/s. S.N. Enterprises & Anr. | ... | Respondents |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 689 OF 2012
| Sundaram Finance Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Preetam Pardesi & Anr. | ... | Respondents |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 691 OF 2012
| India Bulls Financial Services Ltd. ... Versus Monarch Ispat Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ... |
Applicant/Claimant Respondents |
|---|---|
| EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. | 692 OF 2012 |
| India Bulls Financial Services Ltd. ... Versus |
Applicant/Claimant |
| Gaskets and Braks Parts Co. & Ors. ... |
Respondents |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 693 OF 2012
| India Bulls Financial Services Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Footmal Harakchand Jain & Anr. | ... | Respondents |
| Waghmare |
1/9
14-63.EXA.687.12.doc
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 694 OF 2012
| India Bulls Financial Services Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Uttam Biotech Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. | ... | Respondents |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 695 OF 2012
| Shriram Chits (Mah.) Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| M/s. Car Mall & Ors. | ... | Respondents |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 699 OF 2012
| M/s. Pushpam Exhibitors | ... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| M/s. Sachinam Enterprise | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 700 OF 2012
| M/s. Pushpam Exhibitors Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| M/s. Satyam Enterprise | ... | Respondent |
| EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. | 701 OF 2012 |
|---|---|
| M/s. Pushpam Exhibitors ... Versus |
Applicant/Claimant |
| M/s. Sundaram Enterprise ... |
Respondent |
2/9
Waghmare
14-63.EXA.687.12.doc
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 703 OF 2012
| M/s. Pushpam Exhibitors Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| M/s. Sachinam Enterprise | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 706 OF 2012
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Ganesh Balubhai Desai | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 707 OF 2012
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Imtiyaz Iqbal Sangram | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 708 OF 2012
| M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Manbhavati Ramesh Pandit | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 721 OF 2012
| Hallmark Interior Lifestyles Pvt. Ltd. | ... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| Sands Hotel Pvt. Ltd. | ... | Respondent |
3/9
Waghmare
14-63.EXA.687.12.doc
| EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. | 722 OF 2012 |
|---|---|
| Relicance Capital Ltd. ... Versus |
Applicant/Claimant |
| Rajukumar Pyarelal Santoshi & Anr. ... |
Respondents |
| EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. | 723 OF 2012 |
|---|---|
| Kotak Mahindra Bank ... Versus |
Applicant/Claimant |
| Nehal Wahjulhaq Khan ... |
Respondent |
| EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. | 724 OF 2012 |
|---|---|
| Kotak Mahindra Bank ... Versus |
Applicant/Claimant |
| Rangaswami Sanjanna Chakala ... |
Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 729 OF 2012
| M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Mukesh Kirchand Shah |
... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 730 OF 2012
| M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. Versus |
... Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|
| Sequiera Neely | ... Respondent |
4/9
Waghmare
14-63.EXA.687.12.doc
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 731 OF 2012
| M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Vineet Vinodkumar Agarawal | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 732 OF 2012
| M/s. Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Sajid Ahmed Shaikh |
... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 738 OF 2012
| M/s. Gordhandas Gobindram Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Union Of India |
... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 740 OF 2012
| M/s. M.N. Polytext Pvt. Ltd. | ... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| M/s. Kajal Creation | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 741 OF 2012
| M/s. M.N. Polytext Pvt. Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| M/s. Nakshtra | ... | Respondent |
5/9
Waghmare
14-63.EXA.687.12.doc
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 743 OF 2012
| M/s. Gunja Silk Fabrics | ... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| M/s. Elite International | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 768 OF 2012
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Ankush Bhatia | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 769 OF 2012
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Nisha Hasmukh Vadukul | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 770 OF 2012
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Amarsingh Thakur | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 771 OF 2012
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Yogesh Ramashish Vishwakarma |
... | Respondent |
6/9
Waghmare
14-63.EXA.687.12.doc
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 772 OF 2012
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Shanti Kumar Laxmichand Jain | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 773 OF 2012
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Vishal Sharma | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 774 OF 2012
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Pamir Ashok Mehta | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 775 OF 2012
| Abhyudaya Co-Op. Bank Ltd. ... Versus |
Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|
| M/s. Tricklers Recreation Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. ... |
Respondents |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 776 OF 2012
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Suleman U Chamadia | ... | Respondent |
7/9
Waghmare
14-63.EXA.687.12.doc
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 778 OF 2012
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Sachin S. Gupte | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 779 OF 2012
| Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Versus |
... | Applicant/Claimant |
|---|---|---|
| Indu Ramkrishna Yadav | ... | Respondent |
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 780 OF 2012
The Punjab And Maharashtra Co-Op. Bank Ltd.... Applicant/Claimant Versus Swagat Bechuram Shukla & Ors. ... Respondents
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 781 OF 2012
The Punjab And Maharashtra Co-Op. Bank Ltd.... Applicant/Claimant Versus Bhimrao Kisan Bhosale & Ors. ... Respondents
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 782 OF 2012
The Punjab And Maharashtra Co-Op. Bank Ltd.... Applicant/Claimant Versus M/s. Sweet Chili Dreams & Anr. ... Respondents
8/9
Waghmare
14-63.EXA.687.12.doc
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 783 OF 2012
The Punjab And Maharashtra Co-Op. Bank Ltd.... Applicant/Claimant Versus Shree Krishna Lalaram Yadav & Ors. ... Respondents
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 784 OF 2012
The Punjab And Maharashtra Co-Op. Bank Ltd.... Applicant/Claimant Versus Sanjeev Kumar Gowda & Ors. ... Respondents
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 785 OF 2012
The Punjab And Maharashtra Co-Op. Bank Ltd.... Applicant/Claimant Versus Purshottam Tahilramani & Ors. ... Respondents
None for the Parties.
CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA, J. DATED : 13th SEPTEMBER, 2019.
P.C. :
1 These Execution Applications have not been proceeded with
for a period of over 12 months from the date of filing of these applications
and have been placed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master under Rule 329 of the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules before this Court for dismissal for want of prosecution. As none appears for the Applicants, the
Execution Applications are dismissed with no order as to costs.
9/9
Waghmare
1 issue framed by the court
Whether execution applications filed over 12 months prior should be dismissed for want of prosecution in the absence of appearance by applicants.
Abhyudaya Co-Op. Bank Ltd.
Sundaram Finance Ltd.
India Bulls Financial Services Ltd.
Shriram Chits (Mah.) Ltd.
M/s. Pushpam Exhibitors
Kotak Mahindra Bank
R.I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
