A Public Interest Litigation was disposed of as withdrawn simpliciter after finding the original petitioner was no longer interested and no interventions occurred despite adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
suresh
912-CRPIL-28.2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.28 OF 2015
Prashant Eknath Bhise .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Others .... Respondents
Mr. Ayaz Khan i/by Ms Zehra Charania for the Petitioner. Ms P.P. Shinde, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. N.R. Bubna for Respondent Nos.3 & 4.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. PATEL, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 13, 2019
P.C:
Page 1 of 2
suresh
912-CRPIL-28.2015.doc
Finding that none has come despite several adjournments, but keeping the cause open we dispose of this criminal PIL.
(G.S. PATEL, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Prashant Eknath Bhise
The State of Maharashtra
Others
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
