Allowed

Pune Municipal Corporation, Thr. Municipal Commissioner v. Mr Rajeev L Sangtani and Ors.

Bombay HC24 Sept 2019CRA/316/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application allowed setting aside an order below and remitting references to the Collector. The Special Land Acquisition Officer to refer matters to the Authority under Sections 51 and 64 of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013. Co-pending Civil Application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order set aside; references remitted to Collector for referral to Authority under Sections 51 and 64 of the Act, 2013; Civil Application disposed.

Pune Municipal Corporation, Thr. Municipal Commissioner Vs… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

Pradnya Bhogale 1 901 cra 316-16.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.316 OF 2016

¶4

Pune Municipal Corporation… Applicant
Vs.

¶5

Rajeev L. Sangtani and Ors.… Respondents

¶6

WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 459 OF 2017
IN

¶7

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.316 OF 2016

¶8

Rajeev L. Sangtani and Ors.… Applicants

¶9

IN THE MATTER OF
Pune Municipal Corporation… Petitioner
Vs.
Rajeev L. Sangtani and Ors.… Respondents

¶10

Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni for the applicant.
Mr. S. R. Ganbavale I/b. Mr. Sangramsinh S. Yadav for respondent
No.1.

¶11

Mr. A.R. Patil, AGP for State/respondent No.5.

¶12

CORAM: M. S. KARNIK, J.

¶13

DATE : 24th SEPTEMBER, 2019.

¶14

P. C.:

¶15

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶16

2. The Full Bench of this Court has in Civil Revision

¶17

Application No.316 of 2016 squarely answered the issue which

¶18

arises for consideration in the present Revision. In view of the
judgment and order passed in Civil Revision Application No.316 of

¶19

1 of 2

¶20

Pradnya Bhogale 2 901 cra 316-16.doc

¶21

2016 the impugned order below Exhibit 24 in Land Reference
No.162 of 2015 is set aside.

¶22

3.As a consequence of setting aside this order the
references made by the Special Land Acquisition Officer to the
District Court will now have to go back to the Collector. In turn
the Special Land Acquisition Officer shall refer the references for
determination to the Authority constituted under Section 51 of the
Act of 2013 in accordance with the provisions contained in
Section 64 of the Act, 2013.

¶23

4.With these observations, the present Civil Revision
Application is allowed. The impugned order is set aside.

¶24

5.In view of the disposal of the Civil Revision
Application, nothing survives for consideration in the Civil
Application. The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly.

¶25

6.The matter be referred by the Special Land Acquisition
Officer to the concerned Authority expeditiously.

¶26

7.Parties to act on an authenticated copy of this order.

Pune Municipal Corporation, Thr. Municipal Commissioner v. Mr Rajeev L Sangtani and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pune Municipal Corporation, Thr. Municipal Commissioner v. Mr Rajeev L Sangtani and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Prasad Vinayak Vaidya Vs M/S. Laurent and Benon Management Consultants Ltd.

Mr. Ananta Sitaram Naik and Ors. Vs Mr. Tarlok Singh Lungani and Ors.

Prakash Laxman Chanderkar Vs Anupam Shrivastava, Chief Manager

Shri Vijaykumar Bhalchandra Joshirao and Ors. Vs Shri Yogesh Prabhakar Joshirao and Ors.

Chhaya Anant Bhandary and Ors. Vs Eversmile Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., through Naresh Mane

Shri Ravi Chagansingh Vyas Vs Shri Pandurang Baburao Ghag (Since Decd.) through Lrs. and Anr.