Dismissed
Vikram Manohar Wadmare v. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Bombay HCCP/820/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.820 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1441 OF 2018
Vikram Manohar Wadmare
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
.. Respondents
Mr M.P. Tripathi, Advocate for petitioner Mr S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for respondent-State
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 09.12.2019
ORAL ORDER :
( ANIL S. KILOR, J.) ( PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
vvr
Vikram Manohar Wadmare
The State of Maharashtra
Prashanna B. Varale
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court