In this contempt petition, the petitioner, with leave of the court, withdrew the petition filed under Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. The court granted leave to withdraw and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the petition is granted; the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902.CP.80..19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.80 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6184 OF 2018
Kiran s/o. Vasant Nikam
…..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …..Respondents
Ms. Anita Gavkar i/b. Mr. Yeramwar Sushant Chandrakantrao, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mrs. M.P. Thakur, AGP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & N.J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATE : 22nd AUGUST, 2019.
P. C. :
clients, seeks leave to withdraw the Petition. Leave as prayed for is
granted.
[N.J. JAMADAR, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
AGP 1/1
Kiran s/o. Vasant Nikam
The State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
N.J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
