at Ganjgolai Area are permitted to occupy the portion,
which is earmarked for the development of the road.
Thus, the Division Bench in clear and unambiguous words
was pleased to observe that it would not be possible for
this Court to consider the contentions of petitioner at
this stage without considering the reply of the other
side. Then this court observed that in any eventuality
the public streets are meant for the use of the citizens
and permitting encroachment on the portion of road would
surely hinder the traffic. There cannot be any dispute
on this observation of the Division Bench. The Division
Bench observed that the Municipal corporation, Latur as
such shall not permit rehabilitation of the
occupants/hawkers on the portion earmarked for the road,
subject to further orders those would be passed in this
petition. Thus, the petition is still pending in this
Court for further hearing disposal.
4.The learned Counsel for the petitioner had
invited our attention to the documents placed on record.
Now these documents only refer to the exchange of
communication between the respondent authorities.
Firstly, the Deputy Commissioner of Latur Municipal
Corporation informed the Police Inspector of the Traffic
Branch, Latur that his opinion is awaited on the issue
of creation of Hawkers Zone. The perusal of this
communication further shows that a list submitted by the
committee of members is also provided. Then a
communication in Annexure is also placed on record. Then
there is also communication placed on record by the
petitioner himself. The Police Inspector of Police
Station, Gandhi Chowk, Latur informed the Commissioner
