Contempt petition disposed of after respondent accepted apology for delay in complying with writ order regarding decision on an association representation. Court accepted explanation for delay as unintentional.
Apology accepted; Contempt Petition disposed of as order of this Court is complied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CP-653-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.653 OF 2017 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.6241 OF 2016
Shashikala Dodhu Sonawane
..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
..Respondents
Mr A.G. Talhar, Advocate for petitioner
Mr S.G. Sangle, AGP for respondent no.1
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 20.11.2019
ORAL ORDER :
2
CP-653-2017
Finance department several times and the Finance department had raised several queries and gave an opinion and thereafter only the decision was taken.
( ANIL S. KILOR, J.)
( PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
vvr
Shashikala Dodhu Sonawane
The State of Maharashtra
Prasanna B. Varale
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
