The High Court of Bombay adjourned a batch of five contempt petitions because the counsel for the respondents was hospitalized and unable to attend the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
osk 40cpst83732017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION (ST.) NO. 8373 OF 2017
Vijay Sakharam Gaikar … Petitioner V/s. Haresh K. Nanwani & Ors. … Respondents
WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (ST.) NO. 8374 OF 2017 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (ST.) NO. 8376 OF 2017 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (ST.) NO. 8378 OF 2017 WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION (ST.) NO. 8379 OF 2017 WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION (ST.) NO. 8383 OF 2017 WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION (ST.) NO. 8510 OF 2017 WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION (ST.) NO. 8513 OF 2017
Mr.Yuvraj Patil for Petitioner(s). Mr.Arvind Aswani i/b. Mr.Rajeev Sharma for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
1/2
osk 40cpst83732017.odt
CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J.
DATE : 23rd July 2019.
P.C. :
1] It is submitted that, the Advocate on record for the respondent Nos.1 to 3 is hospitalized and is unable to attend the Court today.
At the request of the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 3, stand over to 6th August 2019.
[A.S. GADKARI, J.]
2/2
Vijay Sakharam Gaikar
Haresh K. Nanwani
Others
A.S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
21 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
