Contempt petition filed for non-compliance of an earlier order. Petitioner stated the order was complied with, and the Court disposed of the petition accordingly.
Contempt petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
CP 389.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.389 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO 13667 OF 2018
Shivbhushan Laxman Jadhav. Petitioner Versus
State of Maharashtra and others. Respondents
Mr. R.C. Brahmankar, Advocate holding for Mr. N.L. Jadhav, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.S. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent / State.
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & AVINASH.G. GHAROTE, JJ.
DATE : 3 September 2019.
ORDER :-
. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. On the
grievance that order of this Court is not complied with, simple
notice was issued to respondent No.3 by an order dated 24 June 2019. In response to the said notice, detail affidavit-in-reply is
filed on behalf of respondent No.3 Deelip Dharurkar, the State
Information Commissioner.
this Court now the order of this Court is duly complied with and
(2)
CP 389.19.odt
the grievance of the petitioner no more survives. In view of this statement made by learned Counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed of.
(AVINASH.G. GHAROTE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
vdd
Shivbhushan Laxman Jadhav
State of Maharashtra
Deelip Dharurkar
Prasnna B. Varale
Avinash. G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
