Sunita Sidramappa Girwalkar v. Baliram P Lahane and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
363.19cp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.363 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.7517 OF 2016
Dr. Sunita Sidramappa Girwalkar,
Age: 59 years, Occ: Service,
R/o. Sindhu Apartment, Near Deshi
Kendra School, Shivajinagar, Latur
Tq. & Dist. LaturPETITIONER
VERSUS
1.Dr. Baliram P. Lahane,
The Joint Director,
Higher Education,
Nanded Region, Nanded
2.Ramjan M. Mulani
The Registrar,
Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada
University, Nanded
3. Dr. Aasha Munde, The Principal, Smt. Sushiladevi Deshmukh Senior College, Khadgaon Road, Latur District Latur RESPONDENTS
Mr P.B. Joshi, Advocate h/f Mr Anand D. Kawre, Advocate
for petitioner;
Mrs P.V. Diggikar, A.G.P. for respondent No.1;
Mr A.V. Hon, Advocate for respondent No.3;
( 2 ) 363.19cp
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.
DATED :24th SEPTEMBER, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner.
2.In response to the notice issued to respondent
Nos. 1 and 3 only by this Court vide order dated 13th
June, 2019, an affidavit in reply is filed on behalf of
respondent No.1 through Dr. Baliram Lahane, working as
Joint Director, Higher Education, Nanded Region, Nanded.
Perusal of the said affidavit in reply, more particularly
paragraph-9 which reads thus:
"I say and submit that Respondent no.2
(University) had granted approval to the post of A.
Professor on adhoc basis on 12.02.1996. As per the
Hon'ble High Court Order dated 15.01.2019 the
office of the deponent quashed and set aside the
impugned communication dated 30.3.16 & 16.4.16 vide
office letter no.3286, dated 01/07/2019 and further
advised to the respondent no.03 to make pay
fixation of the petitioner as per the Hon'ble High
Court's order".
3.In the light of above, it can safely be
said that the order passed by this Court is duly
complied with. Respondent No.3 Principal, Smt.
Sushiladevi Deshmukh Women College, Latur is also
informed of the decision by the State Government by
communication dated 28th August, 2019 and copy of
the same is placed on record as annexure R-2 to the
affidavit in reply.
4. As the order of this Court is duly complied
with, nothing survives in the present contempt
petition and same is accordingly disposed of.
[AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.]
Tupe
Dr. Sunita Sidramappa Girwalkar
Dr. Baliram P. Lahane
Ramjan M. Mulani
Dr. Aasha Munde
Prasanna B. Varale
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court