The Court disposed of Contempt Petition No.348 of 2019 arising from Writ Petition No. 1549 of 2019. The petitioner's grievance regarding his service period ceased upon the Zilla Parishad CEO treating the period as 'permissible leave' under Rule 72 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Suspension) Rules, 1981.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
CP-348.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.348 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1549 OF 2019
Devidas Ganpat Pagar. Petitioner Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another.
Respondents
Mr. D.R. Irale Patil, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. A.B. Girase, Government Pleader for the respondents.
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & AVINASH.G. GHAROTE, JJ.
DATE : 9 September 2019.
ORDER :
. Mr. Irale Patil, learned Counsel appearing for the
petitioner submitted that during pendency of the petition, an order is passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad dated 05.09.2019, whereby the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad treated the period from 12.01.2016 to 01.12.2016 as “permissible leave period” in view of
the provisions of Maharashtra Civil Services (Suspension) Rules, 1981 and more particularly Rule 72 thereof. It is also stated that
(2)
CP-348.19.odt
the order of Chief Executive Officer is subject to the review application filed on behalf of Chief Executive Officer before the Divisional Officer.
(AVINASH.G. GHAROTE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
vdd
Devidas Ganpat Pagar
The State of Maharashtra
PRASANNA B. VARALE
AVINASH.G. GHAROTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
