The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Civil Appellate Side, held that civil contempt was not made out as independent remedies existed to challenge the order. The Court disposed of the misconceived contempt petition without costs.
No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
cp.293.2019_902.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.293 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.887 OF 2013
Shri Chavan Bhimrao Shankar … Petitioner
Vs
Shri Dinesh Waghmare & Ors. … Respondents
Mr.I.M. Khairdi for the Petitioner
Mr.V.M. Mali, AGP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R. I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATED: NOVEMBER 28, 2019
dated 17.3.2017, a copy of which is at pages 40 to 43 of the paperbook, we do not think that a case of civil contempt is made out.
or otherwise but by ignoring a specific Government Resolution. Nonetheless, an order in terms of a direction of this Court has been passed. That may be erroneous or illegal but surely when
Page 1 of 2
cp.293.2019_902.doc
there are independent remedies available to challenge that order, civil contempt is not made out.
(S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page 2 of 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the facts disclosed in the contempt petition constituted a case of civil contempt.
Whether there are independent remedies available to challenge the impugned order.
Whether the contempt petition was misconceived.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Chavan Bhimrao Shankar
Shri Dinesh Waghmare & Ors.
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
R. I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
