Disposed

Premla Dattatray Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC7 Aug 2019CP/29/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Contempt Petition challenging non-compliance with a Writ Petition order regarding the petitioner's transfer, the High Court recorded satisfaction upon receiving the Chief Executive Officer's order effecting the transfer. The Court held that the grievance no longer survives as the transfer order was duly complied with., and disposed of the petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

Premla Dattatray Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

13-CP.29-19.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.29 OF 2019
IN WP/11066/2018
WITH CA/5397/2019 IN CP/29/2019

¶4

PREMLA DATTATRAY JADHAV

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶7

Mr. Suvidh Kulkarni, Advocate for petitioner
Mrs.G.L.Deshpande, AGP for respondent no.1
Mr. S.B.Pulkundwar, Advocate for respondent nos.3 to 5

¶8

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE

¶9

 AND
R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
 DATE : AUGUST 07, 2019

¶10

PER COURT :-

¶11

Heard Mr.Suvidh Kulkarni, learned Counsel for
the petitioner.

¶12

2.A grievance is raised in this Contempt

¶13

Petition of non-compliance of order of this Court dated
04.10.2018 in Writ Petition No.11066 of 2018.

¶14

2 13-CP.29-19

¶15

respondent no.3 – Zilla Parishad (through its Chief
Executive Officer), has placed on record a copy of
the order passed by the Chief Executive Officer,
Zilla Parishad, Nanded, dated 18.06.2019.

¶16

4.Mr.Kulkarni, learned Counsel for the

¶17

petitioner, on instructions, submits that in the
immediate response to the communication dated
18.01.2019 issued by the office of Divisional
Commissioner, through the Deputy Commissioner
(Establishment), respondent no.3 - Chief Executive
Officer, Zilla Parishad, by exercising his powers,
posted the petitioner in Zilla Parishad Primary
School, Gadegaon (new), Tq. and Dist. Nanded.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was neither informed about this order nor
he has received any such communication.

¶18

5.Be that as it may, today, the order dated
18.06.2019 issued by the Chief Executive Officer,

¶19

3 13-CP.29-19

¶20

Zilla Parishad, is taken on record and marked as “X”

¶21

for identification. On a specific query made to
learned Counsel for the petitioner, whether the
petitioner is willing to join at the place, where she
has been posted, learned Counsel for the petitioner,
on instructions, states that the petitioner is
willing to join at the place of transfer i.e. at
Zilla Parishad Primary School, Gadegaon (new), Tq.
and Dist. Nanded, on or before 13.08.2019.

¶22

6.In view of the order dated 18.06.2019 issued
by respondent no.3 – Chief Executive Officer, Zilla
Parishad, it can safely be said that the order of
this Court passed in Writ Petition, has been duly
complied with and the grievance raised by the
petitioner no more survives.

¶23

7.In view of the above, the Contempt Petition

¶24

stands disposed of.

¶25

kbp

Premla Dattatray Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Premla Dattatray Jadhav v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Omprakash Kishanlal Mutha Vs the Union of India and Others

Mahyco Research Foundation Trust Jalna through Its Authorized Signatory and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Mahyco Research Foundation Trust Jalna through Its Authorized Signatory and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Mahendra Rajendra Deshmukh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Kautik Namdeo Dandge Vs Sudhakar S Vyavahare and Others

Madhukar Namdeo Bavaskar and Others Vs Aurangabad Municipal Corporation through Its Commissioner