The single-judge bench dismissed a contempt petition filed in a writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, granting liberty to file a fresh petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 904CP232.2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 232 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9936 OF 2015
Sandip Vinod Karhale
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
…. Respondents
Shri. S. R. Barlinge, Advocate for the petitioner Shri. V. S. Badakh, AGP for respondent/State Respondents No. 3 & 4 served.
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATE : 6TH AUGUST, 2019
PER COURT :-
. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, on establishing contact with the petitioner, it revealed that the petitioner failed to provide necessary information to the learned counsel and as such, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file fresh petition.
pgs
Sandip Vinod Karhale
The State of Maharashtra
Prasanna B. Varale
R. G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
