The petitioner sought to withdraw the contempt petition after withdrawing an associated writ petition. The court granted leave to withdraw the petition, discharged the contempt notice, and cancelled the issued distress warrant.
Contempt petition allowed to be withdrawn; contempt notice discharged; distress warrant cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
510 cp 225-19.doc
Pradnya Bhogale
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.225 OF 2019
Office Notes, Office
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court’s ordersCourt’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and Registrar’s
orders
Mr. Girish R. Agrawal for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Babar, AGP for State/Respondent No.2.
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.
DATE : 19th SEPTEMBER, 2019
P.C.
. Not on board. Taken on board.2.In view of the withdrawal of Writ Petition
No.7564 of 2015, learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks leave to withdraw the Contempt Petition as
well.
3. The Contempt Petition is allowed to be withdrawn.
4.The petitioner filed affidavit that he does not
want to pursue the Contempt Petition. The
petitioner who is personally present in the Court has
filed this affidavit. The copy of the affidavit is taken
on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification.
1 Of 2
510 cp 225-19.doc
5.The contempt notice is discharged. The
distress warrant issued stands cancelled.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.)
2 Of 2
Pradnya Bhogale
State
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court