This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902.CP.22.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 CONT. PETITION NO.22 OF 2019
IN WP/10284/2013
MAIBU MAHEBU GULZAR TADVI L.RS. BISMILLA S/O MAIBU ALIAS MAIBU TADVI AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Saisagar A. Ambilwade AGP for Respondent: Mr. P.G. Borade
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATE : 25th June, 2019
ORAL ORDER :
The learned counsel on instructions prays for
withdrawal of the petition. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the order of this Court is duly complied with. As such the grievance raised in the petition no more survives, petition is allowed to be withdrawn. Disposed of as withdrawn.
(R. G. AVACHAT, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
habeeb
1/1
MAIBU MAHEBU GULZAR TADVI LRS.
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
PRASANNA B. VARALE
R.G. AVACHAT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
