Petitioner in contempt petition was directed to pay a withheld balance amount of Rs.4034/- by the State. The relief was complied with in court, and the contempt petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 )
206.19cp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.206 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.903 OF 2018
Sharad s/o Panditrao Patil, Age: 50 years, Occ: Service, At present working with the North Maharashtra University Jalgaon at Jalgaon Tq. & Dist. Jalgaon
PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra (Through its Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32) & ors
RESPONDENTS
Ms Seema Pawar, Advocate h/f Mr A.G. Talhar, Advocate for the petitioner; Mrs P.V. Diggikar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 & 2; Mr A.B. Girase, Advocate for respondent No.4
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & AVINASH G. GHAROTE, JJ.
DATED : 9th OCTOBER, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
A detailed order was passed by this Court on
25th September, 2019, whereby Joint Director of Higher Education was directed to remain present in the Court on 9th October, 2019 with either cheque or demand draft of Rs.4034/-, as the balance amount of Rs.4034/- is admittedly not paid to the petitioner and withheld by the authority under an erroneous impression, that it is not payable.
the future, as the same results in filing of proceedings, which in the first instance can be avoided thereby saving the time of the Court.
[AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.]
Tupe
Sharad s/o Panditrao Patil
The State of Maharashtra (Through its Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32) & ors
Prasanna B. Varale
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
