Contempt petition disposed of by the High Court of Bombay at Goa. The court accepted a statement regarding issuance of NOC and an affidavit tendering apology, noting contempt was substantially purged.
The contempt petition is disposed of as the contempt has been substantially purged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 cp01-19-01-02-19
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA CONTEMPT PETITION NO.1 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.1130 OF 2018
Nishikant S. Narvekar…... Petitioner.
V/s.
…...
Rajesh Asolkar. Respondent.
Mr. Prasheen Lotlikar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Somnath Karpe, Advocate for the Respondent.
Coram : M.S. Sonak &
Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.
Date : 1 February 2019
P.C.:
Mr. Karpe, learned Counsel for the Respondent, on the
basis of the instructions from the Respondent, makes a statement that
the concerned NOC will be issued to the Petitioner by 4 February
2019.
2.The statement is accepted. Issuance of such NOC shall
be subject to the final orders in the Revision Petition No.3/2018,
pending before the Directorate of Panchayats. Further the Panchayat
makes it clear that issuance of the NOC is without prejudice to the
rights and contentions of both, the Petitioner as well as the Applicant
2 cp01-19-01-02-19
in the said Revision Petition.
3.Mr. Karpe also files an affidavit on behalf of the
Respondent, in which the Respondent has tendered apology and
explained the circumstances in which the earlier orders could not be
complied with within the prescribed period.
4.Having perused the affidavit, we accept the apology
and further taking into consideration that the contempt has been
substantially purged, we dispose of this contempt petition.
(Prithviraj K. Chavan, J.) (M.S. Sonak, J.)
Nishikant S. Narvekar
Rajesh Asolkar
M.S. Sonak
Prithviraj K. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court