ascertain the entitlement of the petitioners and the Executive Engineer by communication dated 27.05.2017 informed the Executive Director of G.M.I.D.C., Aurangabad that on assessment, it is found that the petitioners are entitled to only an amount to the tune of Rs.26,99,131/- and the said amount was deposited in the office of the Collector vide cheque No.834844 dated 15th February, 2019 and this fact is referred to in the affidavit in reply filed on behalf of respondent No. 3 - the Principal Secretary. Now, if the Division Bench of this Court made it clear in its order of which contempt is alleged of that if the petitioners found to be entitled for an amount and when there is a dispute raised on an issue of entitlement of petitioners in the present contempt petition, we cannot permit ourselves to expand the scope of the contempt petition and thrust power on ourselves to decide this dispute as if we are called upon to decide the dispute in an independent proceeding. This would be certainly exceeding our powers in dealing with the contempt petition. As the order of the Division Bench is complied with by depositing the amount of Rs. 26,99,131/- in the office of the Collector, Aurangabad, at the most, we may grant liberty to the petitioners to seek withdrawal of the amount by taking appropriate steps. The learned Counsel submits that amount was deposited in the office of the Collector. The learned Counsel Mr Bhalerao, submits on instructions that an amount of Rs.26,99,131/- is already withdrawn by the petitioners. This fact of withdrawal of the amount is admitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners. As such, nothing
