Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the contempt petition, which was granted, and the matter was disposed of as withdrawn by an oral order.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp127.19
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.127 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10126 OF 2016
Kunal Bhatesingh Vasave ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai ..RESPONDENT
Mr D.S. Bagul, Advocate for petitioner
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND
S.M. GAVHANE, JJ.
th February, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
Mr Bagul, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Leave granted. Contempt Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(S.M. GAVHANE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
amj
Kunal Bhatesingh Vasave
Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai
Prasanna B. Varale
S.M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
