K. Bhujangadhar Rao and Anr. v. Sunil Bhujangadhar Rao and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition allowed due to withdrawal filed by petitioners.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition withdrawn and disposed of.
Contempt petition allowed due to withdrawal filed by petitioners.
Contempt petition withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1
34-CONP-1-2014 S-1646-2008.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1 OF 2014 IN
SUIT NO.1646 OF 2008
K. Bhujangadhar Rao & Anr. .. Petitioners Vs. Sunil Bhujangadhar Rao & Ors. .. Respondents
Ms. Bhairavi N. Pathak for petitioners.
Mr.Ganesh Sitaram Bhat for respondents.
CORAM : N.J. JAMADAR, J.
DATE : 11TH NOVEMBER 2019
P.C.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions in writing, submits that the petitioners do not want to proceed with the contempt petition and desire to withdraw the same. The said letter dated 24th May 2016 is taken on record.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, the contempt petition stands disposed of.
[ N.J. JAMADAR, J. ]
Shraddha Talekar PS
K. Bhujangadhar Rao & Anr.
Sunil Bhujangadhar Rao & Ors.
N.J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court