Disposed

Mirc Electronics Ltd. v. J.P. Electronics and 3 Ors.

Bombay HC18 Sept 2019COMSS/39/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a commercial summary suit based on an out-of-court settlement. The plaintiff was permitted to amend the plaint to add an employee as a defendant, and payments and withdrawal of pending proceedings were agreed upon.

What did the court decide?

The commercial summary suit is disposed of; plaintiff permitted to amend title to add confirming party as defendant.

Mirc Electronics Ltd. Vs J.P. Electronics… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

902.COMSS.39.10.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

¶3

COMMERCIAL SUMMARY SUIT NO. 39 OF 2010

¶4

MIRC Electronics Ltd. ... Plaintiff Versus M/s. J.P. Electronics & Ors. ... Defendants

¶5

Mr. C.N. Chavan for the Plaintiff. Mr. Menal Shah for Defendant Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Darshan Juikar for Defendant No.4. Mr. Abhishek Saboo, Defendant No.4, present in person.

¶6

CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA, J.

¶7

DATED : 18^th SEPTEMBER, 2019.

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

1 The parties have arrived at a settlement in the above Commercial Summary Suit. The consent terms are tendered and are taken on record and marked “X” for identification.

¶10

2 The confirming party is present in Court and his presence is

noted.

1/3

Waghmare

902.COMSS.39.10.doc

3 The consent terms are executed between the Plaintiff and the

¶16

Defendants. One Mr. Abhishek Saboo, who is the employee of the Plaintiff has also signed the consent terms as a confirming party. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff states that he will join Mr. Abhishek Saboo as a Defendant and the amendment shall be carried out forthwith.

¶17

4 Permission is granted to the Plaintiff to carry out the amendment in the cause title of the Plaint by joining Mr. Abhishek Saboo, which amendment shall be carried out forthwith. There is an undertaking in Clause 9 of the consent terms which is treated as an undertaking to this Court.

¶18

5 In clauses 16 and 17 of the consent terms the proceedings mentioned therein have been agreed to be withdrawn by the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff undertakes not to prosecute these proceedings.

¶19

6 In clause 18 of the consent terms it agreed that the Defendant shall withdraw the complaint pending before the 26^th Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Borivali, Mumbai, against the Plaintiff and its then sales staff/representatives and that the Defendants undertakes not to pursue the matter.

2/3

Waghmare

902.COMSS.39.10.doc

7 The undertakings in clauses 16, 17 and 18 are treated as

¶24

undertakings to this Court and are accepted.

¶25

8 The Commercial Summary Suit is accordingly disposed of in

¶26

terms of the consent terms.

¶27

9 The Plaintiff shall be entitled to refund of Court fees as per applicable rule. This order shall be treated as the application for refund of Court fees.

¶28

(R.I. CHAGLA, J.)

¶29

3/3

¶30

Waghmare

Mirc Electronics Ltd. v. J.P. Electronics and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mirc Electronics Ltd. v. J.P. Electronics and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

0 Vs Sudhir Mathurdatt Joshi

Hemraj Devkarandas Metal and Minerals Limited Vs Sanket Dilip Mestry and Anr./Insolvent

Smt. Kailash B.Shah Vs Arvind a,Shah and Ors./Prafulla a. sanghrajika Applicant

Citicorp Finance (India) Ltd. Vs Prakash Pawar S/O Dhanraj Pawar and Anr.

Devabrata Bhabatosh Moulick and 5 Ors. Vs Shrusti Sangam Developers Pvt. Ltd. and 7 Ors(Judgement Debt.) and Shrushti Raj Enter. (I) Ltd. and an

Gavde Finance Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Official Liquidator (Birla Surya Ltd.)