The High Court disposed of the chamber summons as it survives the withdrawal of the underlying writ petition. No substantive legal issue or judgment is recorded.
Disposed of as the underlying writ petition was withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(20-A)CS-327-18.doc
rkmore
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.327 OF 2018
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2787 OF 2018
Peter William Parmar & Ors. ..Applicants.
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Peter William Parmar & Ors. ..Petitioners.
v.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.S.B.Talekar alongwith Ms.Madhavi Ayyappan for the Petitioner. Mr.Kedar Dighe, AGP for State/Respondent Nos.1 to 5, 8 , 9. Mr.S.P.Thorat, for Respondent No.3. Mr.H.T. Pawar, for Respondent No.7.
CORAM : INDRAJIT MAHANTY & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : 11th January, 2019.
P.C.
1] As Writ Petition No. 2787 of 2018 stands disposed off as withdrawn, Chamber Summons No.327 of 2018 does not survive, hence, the same stands disposed off.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J)
(INDRAJIT MAHANTY, J)
1/1
Peter William Parmar & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Indrajit Mahanty
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
