Court disposed of a chamber summons in a commercial IP suit after hearing parties and reviewing affidavits where plaintiff agreed to deletion of portions.
Chamber summons stands disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1.CHS-40-2018.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.40 OF 2018 IN
COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO.32 OF 2009
Neha Sharad Joshi ….Plaintiff
Vs.
Sunanda Sampooran Oberoi and Ors. ….Defendants
Ms. Neeta Jain a/w. Ms. Raveena Yadav I/b. Ashok Purohit and Co. for applicant/plaintiff.
Mr. Ajit Kapadia a/w. Mr. Aditya Chitale I/b. MNSQ Legal for defendant no.1.
Ms. Niyati Merchant I/b. M/s. MDP and Partners for defendant no.2. Mr. Sanjeel Kadam a/w. Ms. Sayli Rajpurkar I/b. Kadam and Co. for defendant no.3.
CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 1st JULY 2019
P.C.:
1 Heard the counsel and went through the affidavit in examination in chief dated 8th April 2013 and further affidavit of plaintiff in examination in chief dated 4th December 2017, at great length. After hearing
the parties, Ms. Jain was agreeable to delete certain portions of the affidavits, which have been scored off and initialed by plaintiff.
2 Chamber summons accordingly stands disposed.
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Gauri Gaekwad
Neha Sharad Joshi
Sunanda Sampooran Oberoi and Ors.
K.R.SHRIRAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
