Allowed

Rohit Kewalram Gour v. the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur

Bombay HC6 Nov 2019CAW/1891/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, allowed a Civil Application arising out of Public Interest Litigation No.131/2017, directing the petitioner and interveners to file an undertaking regarding street vending without vending from the roadside or encroaching on road-side areas.

What did the court decide?

Directions to file affidavit and undertake not to vend from the side of the street and not to encroach upon road-side areas.

Rohit Kewalram Gour Vs the Divisional… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

0611caw1891.19.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.1891/2019 IN

¶5

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.131/2017 Rohit Kewalram Gour

¶6

...Versus...

¶7

State of Maharashtra, Through its Secretary, Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai and others

¶8

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -

¶9

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders

¶10

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- - -
 Ms Sejal Lakhani, Counsel h/f Shri S.P. Bhandarkar, Counsel for petitioner
 Shri A.M. Deshpande, Addl. G.P. for respondent nos.1 & 5 to 7
 Shri S.M. Puranik, Counsel for respondent no.2

¶11

 Shri R.O. Chhabra,Counsel for respondent no.3
 Shri S.S. Sanyal, Counsel for respondent no.8
 Shri S.A. Radke, Counsel for respondent no.13

¶12

 Shri Onkar Ghare, Counsel h/f Shri A.M. Ghare, Counsel for intervener

¶13

CORAM : R. K. DESHPANDE AND

¶14

 MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE: 06/11/2019

¶15

Heard.

¶16

For the reasons stated in the application, the civil
application is allowed.

¶17

The applicants/interveners to file affidavit and also
undertaking before this Court that they are not vending by the
side of the street and they shall not in future continue to encroach
upon the road side areas for vending.

¶18

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.131/2017

¶19

Stand over to 20/11/2019 for further consideration.

¶20

 (Milind N. Jadhav, J.) (R.K. Deshpande, J.)

¶21

Wadkar, P.S.

Rohit Kewalram Gour v. the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Kewalram Gour v. the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sou.Ashabai W/O.Laxman Gawande. Vs Addl.Commissioner Amravati Divn. and Others.

Himmat Waman Tople.... Vs Additional Commisisoner and Othes.

Ganesh Sudhakarrao Lakshmapure Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary for Rural Development Dept. and Another

Gajanan S/O Bisanji Viadya Vs the Deputy Director of Education, Nagpur Division, Nagpur and Others

Shetkari Sahakari Dhaan Girni Mary. Dongargaon Thr. Manager, Shri. Vilas Yeshwant Samrit Vs Maha. State Co-Op. Marketing Federation Ltd., Bhandara Thr. District Marketing Officer and Another

Bhandara Zilla Sahakari Krishi Audyogik Sangh Ltd. Bhandara Thr. Manager Shri Bharat Gyaniram Thakr Vs the Maha. State Co-Op. Marketing Federation Ltd. Bhandara Thr. District Marketing Officer and Anoth